|
NEWS Military Space Above Top Secret Pic Of The Week HOME | [Search] |
Nuclear Propulsion |
|||||||||||
Oak Ridge, Project SIGN and the hunt for radioactive UFOs
The Manhattan Project had considered the possibility of powering ships and aircraft with nuclear energy, but with most of its creative energy focused on designing bombs, it did little serious work on non-weapon applications during the war. In order to begin to understand the issues resulting from placing a reactor in an airplane, and to help uncover unanticipated problems, in the spring of 1946 the Army Air Force established a project called NEPA -- Nuclear Energy for the Propulsion of Aircraft -- under contract to Fairchild Engine and Airplane Corporation. Known more for its stodgy cargo planes and trainers than for prowess in radically advanced technology, Fairchild seemed ill-suited for the project. The company produced many reports and conducted crude experiments -- placing radium in the bomb bay of a B-29 and measuring the radiation field in the cockpit with geiger counters, and so on -- but made little real progress toward building an actual nuclear-powered airplane. In 1947, at the height of the flying saucer wave of early July, a sensational article on an alleged "atomic-powered" Russian saucer appeared in the Los Angeles Examiner. According to the story, a "top-flight nuclear physicist" in Los Angeles had received a mysterious letter containing a description of the Soviet saucer from someone associated with an officer of a Russian oil tanker which was docked in Los Angeles harbor. The letter claimed to describe a "kidney-shaped" aircraft, just eighteen inches thick, with a highly polished surface. The pilot was said to lay prone in a cockpit that was cooled against the heat produced by the saucer's tremendous speed. "The lifting force is an entirely new principle, found about 10 years ago among the unpublished papers of a Russian chemist," the story claimed. "Energy is required only for climbing, but no energy is needed for support when the airplane goes along the earth's gravitational contour lines." The letter was supposedly turned over to the FBI.
While the 1947 Examiner "Red Atomic Disk" story had more in common with contemporary pulp science fiction tales than with genuine nuclear aircraft concepts, concerns about real Soviet nuclear-powered aircraft, and the problems inherent in transporting American bombs to Soviet targets, were beginning to stimulate serious nuclear propulsion development efforts in the US.
In 1948, an MIT summer study conference called the "Lexington Project" carried out the first thorough engineering survey of the problems of applying nuclear reactors to aircraft propulsion. It concluded in its final report ("LEX P-1") that the idea was technically achievable on a practical basis (although it would be far from easy and it might take 15 years to produce a flying aircraft), and that two different approaches to the goal seemed apparent. These dealt with the "cycles" used by the jet engines -- "open" or "closed" thermodynamic cycles. In both cases, the heat of the reactor was transferred to the propulsion engine by some working medium. In the open cycle, the turbojet engine's air was the medium, and would simply flow through the reactor, which functioned as a replacement for the combustion chamber where fuel was burned in an ordinary engine. In a closed cycle, a fluid of some type, possibly molten metal, would circulate between the reactor core and the turbine. While vastly more complex in engineering terms, the closed cycle eliminated air as a heat transfer medium and promised much higher engine efficiencies. Because of these
problems, one of the ideas considered by the Lexington group was to simply
eliminate the crew from the nuclear airplane, make it into a flying atomic
tugboat, and let it tow a more conventional airplane -- safely distanced from
the reactor by a long cable -- to the vicinity of a target. Northrop
concept for nuclear-powered bomber with six air-launchable defensive
"parasite fighters," c. 1952 Other researchers
realized that some of these shielding problems could be circumvented through
the use of hot radioisotopes -- essentially a form of nuclear waste -- rather
than a nuclear reactor, as a concentrated heat source for nuclear engines.
These radical engine concepts may have been what Project SIGN's engineers
had in mind when they theorized about advanced atomic engines for man-made
saucers. See: Radioisotope-powered
nuclear aircraft On April 27,
1949, a conference was held at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee (ORNL),
between NEPA contractors, the Air Force, and AEC personnel, with the intent
to plan Oak Ridge participation in the NEPA project. The ORNL NEPA effort
was called the Aircraft Nuclear Propulsion project (ANP) and was established
under Air Materiel Command project officer Lt
Col Clyde D. Gasser See: NEPA
History 1 While many types
of engines were studied, including giant propellers driven by steam turbines,
as of 1951-2 the Air Force's vision of an operational nuclear-powered bomber
centered on the mammoth Convair YB-60, a swept-wing, turbojet-powered modification
of the B-36 strategic bomber. It was a far cry from Newsweek's compact
1945 flying wing. NEPA's July 1947 report had set its sights on the goal of
building an aircraft in the 300,000 lb gross weight range, with a speed of
515 mph at 35,000 ft and a weapon load of 12,000 lb. The B-60 closely followed
those criteria. The nuclear powerplant
designed for the B-60 was the General Electric P-1, an open-cycle, air-cooled
reactor with a thermal output probably in the 50 megawatt range, which was
married to four powerful GE J53 turbojet engines by a complex tangle of air
ducts. Air from the engine compressors would flow directly through the reactor
core, where it would be heated to some 2,000 degrees F before being returned
to the engine turbine sections. The P-1 reactor/X39
engine complex would have been flight tested aboard a highly modified B-36
bomber known as the X-6. The P-1 would have been installed in the X-6's bomb
bay for flight and removed shortly after landing by taxying the plane over
a huge pit equipped with an elevator that would lower the engine into a shielded
isolation area to reduce irradiation of the airframe, crew and ground personnel.
The model (below) shows the four X39 pods protruding from the belly of the
X-6. When the P-1
engine was applied to the actual B-60 production nuclear-powered bomber, the
reactor/J53 engine complex apparently would have been installed in the aft
bomb bay area of the fuselage, as far as possible from the crew compartment.
The arrows, below, indicate the probable location of the engine assembly.
(The B-60 flew numerous times powered by conventional turbojets, but never
with the nuclear engines). Heavy shielding was planned, consisting of tanks
of a water-boron solution (boron-10 isotope is an excellent neutron absorber)
and layers of metal. The crew compartment itself would have had additional
heavy shielding. This "divided shielding" concept was considered
one of the major technical breakthroughs of the early NEPA project. The aircraft
probably would have retained its conventional jet engines for use during takeoff
and landing. Once airborne and away from populated areas, the crew would bring
the reactor up to power and the aircraft would cruise on nuclear heat. The
intention was to create an aircraft with nonstop around-the-world range, endurance
measured in days, and near sonic speed, all while carrying a heavy nuclear
weapon payload. See: Project
SIGN and radioactive UFOs INEEL (established
in 1949 as the National Reactor Testing Station) Test Area North (above) was
the site of Heat Transfer
Reactor Experiments -- "HTRE" -- aircraft nuclear engine prototype
ground-based testing, which began in 1955. The nuclear-powered aircraft prototype
would have been flown from here. A huge hangar was constructed (black building,
center right), but not the fifteen thousand foot runway that a ponderous nuclear
plane would have required. A multi-mile runway for the X-6 was also considered
at Edwards Air Force Base, California, running between Muroc dry lake and
Rosamond dry lake, but it too was never built. A special hangar
for the plane, and associated maintenance facilities, were built with enormously
thick, nuclear-shielded walls and bays. General Electric, the program contractor,
planned to equip the engine maintenance facilities with closed-circuit television
systems and remote manipulator arms to allow technicians to work on the aircraft
and its powerplant without direct exposure to the intense radiation field
that would persist even after the reactor was shut down. Since the turbojets
essentially functioned as the cooling system for the reactor, they would have
to be run at high power settings even after shutdown of the reactor in order
to maintain cooling airflow through the still-hot core. After an initial cooldown
period, ground cooling systems would be connected to the reactor and the engines
could be shut down as the P-1 was extracted from the airplane and placed in
its shielded storage bay. One
of the GE HTRE reactor testbeds at INEL. © 1996, Bureau
of Atomic Tourism. The initial HTRE
engine experiments were intended to prove out the engineering and operational
concepts for a nuclear bomber powerplant, but without the restrictions on
weight and size that an airplane powerplant would demand. These early assemblies
were gigantic monstrosities weighing at least a hundred thousand pounds, and
were built on railcars which would move them to remote test locations far
from their assembly, maintenance and control facilities. When the engineering
aspects of the designs were proven, the next step would be to miniaturize
the designs while increasing their power output, with the goal of producing
a final, operational version of the design that would a fraction of the size
and weight while producing much greater thermal output. This was to be done
in stages over a several year period. General Electric
began HTRE-1 test runs in 1955 and the reactor successfully powered the X39
engines the following year, although the massive contraption was far from
a practical aircraft powerplant. The improved HTRE-II of 1958 had a rated
reactor power output of about 10 Megawatts. HTRE-III continuted the test program
until 1961. The giant HTRE
assemblies were pushed by locomotive to a remote site in Test Area North for
powered testing. They remain radioactive to this day. HTRE-II was shielded
with mercury. To serve as an
airborne reactor testbed, Convair rebuilt a B-36 in 1955 as a special model
called the NB-36H Crusader. The aircraft was equipped with massive
shielding and air-cooling ducting (arrows) to support a small nuclear reactor
in the aft fuselage. The NB-36H was essentially similar to the earlier X-6
concept, but its reactor was far less powerful and was not capable of propelling
the aircraft. A heavily-shielded,
multi-ton sealed crew capsule, equipped with a bank-vault-like hatch and foot-thick
leaded-glass windows, was installed in the forward fuselage. The reactor used
in these tests was known as ASTR - the Aircraft Shield Test Reactor. It was
air-cooled and produced a nominal 1 megawatt output. ASTR was installed in
the NB-36H aft bomb bay in the approximate location of the full-scale P-1
reactor in order to simulate the radiation field and operational techniques
of the larger propulsion reactor. The NB-36 was
based at the Convair plant at Carswell AFB, Ft Worth, Texas. On reactor test
missions, the aircraft would fly west to the White Sands, New Mexico area
where the ASTR would be brought up to power and experiments would begin. In all, 47 flights
were made with the reactor aboard and operating between September 1955 and
March 1957. All flights were followed by an instrumented B-50 bomber carrying
a crew of specially-trained troops. In event of a crash of the NB-36 they
were to parachute to the ground, cordon off the area, and work with local
emergency officials to cope with a radiological disaster. |
|
Air-Attack.com - All About Military Aviation, Space Projects & News |
|
|
All content © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 Air-Attack.com (unless otherwise indicated), all rights reserved. |